Royal Consort
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
The point I was trying to make was I hate all the "new" add-ons. That aren't "new" they are just rehashing old experiences as something you now have to pay extra for now. If Disney holds a special event like Club Villain, Mickey's Very Merry Christmas Party, etc those are additional experiences that provide something extra then what a normal day ticket provides that is completely acceptable, and good for Disney for thinking of new services to provide and make money on.
I am reminded of when businesses found they could sell bottled water!
If Disney wants more of my money then make the ticket prices more expensive, don't give me some tiered experience where I have to count my dollars every time I want to do something. When will Disney World feel like a carnival where I have pay for every experience?
I understand the arguments made on the show regarding the market being a determining factor. It’s certainly correct. If Disney have pushed things too far, the market will respond accordingly. Perhaps.
On the other hand, the argument that Disney is nickel and diming guests is also valid. There’s a slippery slope and I’m reminded of the foot-in-the-door technique (guests are ok with a small and ‘reasonable’ upcharge/loss of a benefit, and only when they agree or accept this change a more significant upcharge/lost benefit will incrementally follow. This makes it more likely that the guest will also accept this). I disagree that this is anything about crowd control. That’s great PR spin but companies are purely profit focused.
I empathise with Steve’s arguments regarding the removal of benefits that were deemed ‘free’. Yet, in a capitalist society it’s important to note that very little is free and I would argue that things like the Magical Express and Extra Magic Hours are already factored in to the high resort costs. I think we’re paying for it anyway. Disney, by introducing a resort fee, are deceptively making guests pay more for what they’ve already paid for! Maybe even for things guests never demanded (i.e. magic bands).
I also think the argument about there being tiered guests is an interesting one. Will there be greater inequality among guests and the way Disney perceive them? I don’t know.
My final observation is one based on values. This is more likely my problem than Disney’s but the message guests may be receiving is ‘’you’re ripe to commercially exploit at every turn and that’s all you are to us’’. Sure, you can make the choice to pay or not and I completely get that. I can afford what Disney is charging without much problem but I dislike that message intensely and it puts me off. Every company perceives guests/customers as revenue but there’s a delicate balance between being subtle and guest focused or overt and bullish. There’s also a line between ‘we charge because we can’ and charging for a good value experience. That message is a powerful one and why I think guests are reacting with hostility about the changes on these boards.
Each panellist made good arguments but I thought it a pity that Steve, Cathy and Theresa didn't quite get a chance to fully articulate their arguments further.
Last edited: