I find this repeated assertion deeply puzzling. I know you object to Bob Chapek having made a statement about the original bill instead of just staying out of it. But once that was done, and once DeSantis chose to appoint his own allies to the board, which was retaliation that violated the company's first amendment rights and their rights to maintain their own private property, what was Disney supposed to do? Roll over? If the government had chosen simply to dissolve the RCID (and assume all the debt/tax liabilities that would have entailed) that would have been one thing, and possibly justifiable under the idea that no theme park company should have special treatment. But instead, DeSantis tried to have it both ways - the government would take no debt or tax liability while still attempting to control the business decisions of a privately owned corporation. That's not how American democracy works. That's not how any of this works.