KrazeeK120
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2012
Yes it was. Though I hadn’t heard it was $45 now. Geez
But, people don’t have to pay that. They can choose to pay $22.
Yes it was. Though I hadn’t heard it was $45 now. Geez
A few short years ago there wasn't a preferred parking though..there was no charge to park closer. I think the point was the amount. It's quite high for the 'privilege' to park closer when just a few years ago you didn't have to pay more for that privilege.Fair enough. The OP posed the question “Who wants to pay $40 for parking at the parks or pay to park at their resort?” The way that was phrased made it sound like people have no choice but to pay $40 to park at the parks (because they actually don’t have a choice as to whether or not they pay to park at the resorts).
There are, apparently, people who want to pay $40 to park at the parks...because they have the option to pay $22.
I think Disney is putting more of a burden on themselves. Let's say someone does bring in a bunch of guns and kills people. Won't all of the lawyers be claiming that Disney should have seen that? After all they are going into everyone's rooms every day specifically to look for that. I would be more worried about missing something then saying "how could we have known".
I'm pretty confident the large majority of people checking in for their vacations have no clue about this policy.
An internet thread went off topic? Say it ain't so! Although this did give me an idea. I'm going to train service dogs to alert people when room service comes in unannounced. That would solve several problems at once.
I knew I had some entrepreneurial motivation somewhere....
To me, there is a big difference between reserving the right to enter a room for various reasons, and having a policy to enter the room every day. I do not believe the policy is made explicit in the booking agreement, and it is common for a hotel to reserve the right to enter in case of a problem.Then maybe they need to take the time to read what they are agreeing to when booking.
Ok.. the constitution on this subject covers law enforcement and government access.. cut and dry there .. Disney can do what they are doing but they will loose resort guests doing it incorrectly and frankly invasive and not worth their overpriced resorts .
There is no real argument for the particular subject. Can they do it ? Yes , will it out people off ? Obviously... and no I absolutely don’t think it’s helpful in any way to protect guests or the liability of the resort.
Also ... if they come in with any room occupied sign up or without knocking and there is a nude child or teen in the room I guarantee there would end up being a lawsuit they will not win and would settle before anyone even knew and possibly a arrest of some kind ..
Well it takes money to operate a parking lot but I think increases could be due to increase of expenses, ability to get more money out of less people, because they can, etc. I don't any one reason is responsible for what I at least perceive to be a rapid increase in a relatively short amount of time.So, are these rapid increases because they are forecasting the need to pay more than anticipated for the new construction going on or because less number of people are being forecast not to visit Disney? Either way, it won’t be an easy pill to swallow. It’s a calculated risk for Disney, in my view, but our economy could be riding at a potential peak of a bubble.
I'm pretty confident the large majority of people checking in for their vacations have no clue about this policy.
The large majority of guests don't decline housekeeping so their experience won't change.
I spoke with my regular travel agent(who talked to a number of her colleagues )...didn't have any idea about the change in this policy. So while those of us on the Disboards are aware, I'll go out on a limb and say the majority of Disney visitors have no idea. Like as has been said before..there's a huge difference between "reserve the right to enter" and "we will enter daily". While it was a blip on some news networks, it isn't made clear to those actually booking a vacation. If you read some of the other message boards you will see that many have a serious problem with losing the do not disturb option, so this isn't a small number of people. Personally, I will go offsite for the next visit for multiple reasons. Cost, decreasing customer service, Parking fees and privacyI'm pretty confident the large majority of people checking in for their vacations have no clue about this policy.
I'm pretty confident the large majority of people checking in for their vacations have no clue about this policy.
I agree.Agreed. I'm also pretty confident those large numbers are still unaware of the policy even after checking out.
Which begs the question.....what is the point?Agreed. I'm also pretty confident those large numbers are still unaware of the policy even after checking out.
Which begs the question.....what is the point?
Keep in mind that this is my opinion, one that others share and some do not. There is no need to argue my points or "correct" my beliefs if you disagree.
I tend do agree. But I don't like the tone that comes across in posting your thoughts and telling others not to comment on them.