You are of course correct, but my point was more about who could afford DVC. In a short window, assuming a 150 point buy in, they went from $15,000 for a buy-in in 2009 to $24,000 for the same buy-in in 2015 - a 60% increase. Meanwhile, data says income went up by maybe 15% in that same window. Therefore Disney is essentially shifting the target income they are aiming for pretty significantly. (Admittedly they did this across the entire theme park business in this period.) I wouldnt' suggest that a family making $130,000 a year can afford the $15,000 and a family making $140,000 can afford $24,000. It's more like $130,000 and $170,000. (You use whatever numbers you like, my point is, it's a higher income bracket.
One COULD argue this - but experience says that the result is that the "prime" locations and prime dates (Oct-Dec) only become more and more difficult to obtain. If you consider "value" to be the ability to switch resorts, "value" has decreased. Myself, I consider the "value" to be at my home resort - and the ability to switch a "bonus". If you take that attitude, you will rarely be disappointed in DVC.
And again - the biggest issue with DVC right now - at least at the new Copper Creek. The AVERAGE buy-in at that location is 140 points - enough for maybe 6-9 nights in a studio. Yet the resort has only 9% of it's points in studios, and 25 % of it's points in expensive 2-bedroom cabins and Grand Villas. Owners buying into DVC at Copper Creek expect a week in a studio are going to find themselves shut out of their home resorts, and then at 7-months (when they can book elsewhere) shut out of most of the other resorts. A similar thing occurred at VGF when only 16% of the points were for Studios - this is going to be way worse.