ziravan
Welcome Home
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2014
To the extent some members believe walking violates the “spirit” of the rules and refuse to engage in the practice, it gives an advantage to those willing to take full advantage of the rules, as currently enforced.
It’s not even an unfair advantage because refusing to engage in an allowed interpretation of the rules is a choice.
From a philosophical ethics point of view, it’s a practical impossibility to get widespread compliance with your view of ethics from people who don’t share your same framework and who aren’t penalized for not doing so.
The practical effect in a competition based environment is unilateral disarmament.
It’s not even an unfair advantage because refusing to engage in an allowed interpretation of the rules is a choice.
From a philosophical ethics point of view, it’s a practical impossibility to get widespread compliance with your view of ethics from people who don’t share your same framework and who aren’t penalized for not doing so.
The practical effect in a competition based environment is unilateral disarmament.
Last edited: