There are many alternatives and variations so I'm sure I'll just scratch the surface. All of these options would apply to a value or moderate option but a moderate would present less challenges. They have 2 basic options from a system standpoint were they to go this route. One would be a totally separate system, possibly with a crossover at some point such as after the 7 month window (maybe 4 or 6 mo) and the other to simply have it be part of DVC with simply less points for those rooms. Really the easiest would be to just have it be part of the club itself and not complicate it with a separate system. There really isn't much downside. In many ways it really wouldn't be any different than adding SSR which has a lower demand than the average at WDW and increased the pressure at the 7 month window dramatically. The issue would be if they created multiple resorts and targeted them at a lower economic tier than the $75K plus household income they targeted for DVC. Esp. if they created a lower quality/price product rather than simply a SSR type option (in principle) at a value or moderate location like say at Ft. Wilderness. Even then the issue would be to protect the new product rather than DVC itself. Marriott tried the latter option and it failed but my opinion is it failed because they didn't create enough of a price separation between their MVCI product and the Horizon's project, plus they didn't have the built in draw of WDW.