right - which is why I mentioned she did two different types of videos. One trying to ride every single attraction in the park and the other one more of a perfect day scenario. One scenario she purposefully didn't try to avoid cris-crossing and the scenario she did more of a most enjoyable touring strategy that involved less running around. Both scenarios resulted in very good return on investment from Genie Plus. Also - both the Legacy FP and FP+ could be maximized if you were willing to cris-cross the parks. With Legacy you literally had to run all around collecting paper tickets if you wanted to get the most rides possible and for FP+ if you just did next available ride time it would more than likely take you all around zig-zagging. That's really not a huge change.Yes, but in the "every single attraction" video, Molly criss-crosses the park many times. She's also a pretty fast walker. She has even specifically said that the only way to get your money's worth from Genie+ is to criss-cross the parks. And that if you prefer to minimize walking and do attractions in the general vicinity, that Genie+ might not be for you. Or, at the very least, you won't get your worth out of it. She also fiddle-faddles quite a bit. Which she did with FP+ too, but it seems to be taken up a notch with Genie+.
Many of us can't, or don't want to, walk 30 miles a day at the Magic Kingdom going from one end of the park to the other.
As far as a planning....it's a huge change, which I have already mentioned. There is a big difference between knowing the actual times that you will be doing a particular attraction, and you can plan your day around those attractions and those particular lands. You will also know, generally, when you can eat lunch or go back to the resort, or leave for the day.....and being sort of at the mercy of the G+ return times. And, even if you don't mind fiddle-faddling, it's not like you are given options....options that you can choose to coordinate with your day. (And yes, sometimes with FP+ there was only one time option, but a lot of the times, there were multiple to choose from)
Listen...this system is the system we have....so I have every intention to watch the videos, do the work, analyze the times, and maximize it to the best of my ability. But, I still think this is a lesser product.
In any of the previous iterations of this FP system, you would have had a long exhausting day of cris-crossing if you were trying to do every attraction in MK and even some of the other parks.
Planning - again you only knew three of your ride times. And with the tiered system they were not likely to be your top 3 choices. If there was a tiered FP system right now at say DHS for example, you would likely have to pick ONE(1) of RotR, Smugglers Run and SDD with the others either having to be rope dropped our take your chances on additional FP being available. Lots of uncertainty there as well. Everyone can have different opinions on if this is a major change to planning. I thought it would be based on what I read in this forum. I watched Molly's videos, read tips and made a plan. We found we were able to stick to our plans quite easily with the biggest issues coming from rides being down which would be a wrench in our plan using any of the previous systems as well.
I'm not arguing if this is a lesser product or a better product. In my mind it was a lesser product as soon as they decided to charge for it. My point is that this is just another capacity management system, there are ways to maximize your value with this system (especially at MK and DHS) and I disagree completely with those who keep asserting that the current system has a lower maximum potential of resource gathering (attraction capacity), with the data we are seeing form thrill data showing the complete opposite so far. Another part of my overall larger point is that I have seen the changes from FP to FP+ to Genie+, and I think a lot of the people who say it is a disaster and doesn't work are looking at it from an emotional perspective and not a rational perspective.