Am I the Only One Who Thinks Disney is Failing In Its Progression Vs. Universal

Well, at the risk of being a straw that breaks the thread, my 2 cents...

1. US and IOA fans need to stop being so tetchy over HP land. Yes attraction numbers will fall, but no one is suggesting it will be deserted. Yes it is important, no it is not the be all and end all of all things.

2. Anyone who spends less than half a day at DHS plainly has never explored it to its fullest. It takes more than half a day to see the shows, and I'm sorry, but even though they may be similar or the same to the last time you went, you should still watch them. You watch movies more than once right?
You have payed a lot more to get into DHS than buy a DVD again ;)


3. Considering the size of the parks then I would say it will take decades for US to approach Disney in terms of development. Sure, they might have more new things, but they have I would say 20% of all entertainment in florida (Sea World having 20% in my view and disney having 60%). Universal might be winning in terms of progression now, but in the future they might not.


Think back to the 90's. When I went in 98 they an appaling ride there. Men in black. Took up a lot of space, was pretty shabby. Queues never exceeded 20 mins as far as I can recall, and that was in August, and when the economy was still strong too. US will need to work hard to keep up their lead in progression, and I dont think they will. They will walk away, dust off their hands and watch as the money comes in from HP land. Their next big investment is a long time coming, I reckon.

EDIT: In fact, is that still there??? if it is, then I think they should have redone that a long time ago.

Also, you have got to remember that even US themselves dont expect to outdo disney, or put them in the shade. The last thing that universal would want is disney stagnating.


They get a LOT of their trade off people piggybacking a visit to US/IOA when going to Disney. If disney numbers fell, they would lose a significant chunk of their attendees in the childrens age range.
 
No flames meant here, we all love Disney (in fact I'm a Disney fanatic), but I've been underwhelmed with their progress as of late. For me, I do not see the cutting edge technology and expansions from the 80's and 90's. Universal has come out with a new roller coaster, Simpsons, Harry Potter, the Mummy etc. Disney has come out with Everest and Toy Story Mania. Don't get me wrong, I like these rides, but what's next? An expansion of Fantasyland including a ride based on a movie from the late 80's, a couple of new meet and greet locations and a new restaurant? I honestly think this fails in comparison, terribly.

Across the country we have Disneyland where they added a new fireworks show (which I admit to be excited for), and are creating Little Mermaid and Cars Land. Do we really a whole land dedicated to Cars? The ride may be fun, but a whole land? Why not Pixar land? Do they not remember the failure that is Bug's Land? Is this the best there is?

Sorry for the rant, but I'm frustrated. I've been going to Disney my whole life and for the first time, I'm spending half of my time off site my next visit visiting other parks. Why not create some of the rides Disney has put up in Disney Paris or Asia for that matter? I realize times are tough, but you need to spend money to make money, and Disney is loosing half their profit from me this year.

I only read the first three pages, but I hope this thread does not get locked before I can come back tomorrow and explain more...

I agree with you, but I see a different direction for a solution.

I feel that Uni/ IOA definitely has more cutting edge technology and I think they are doing a great job in theming. Seuss landing, Jurassic Park and now WWOHP are perfect examples. They are just more directed at the wild rides that I care for.

I think Walt's idea of a park that the whole family can ride together is a good one and I hope Disney stays on that path. While teens and adventure seekers may go through a period of wanting more amusement style rides, I think overall the family theme park appeals to a wider audience base and is what sets it apart from everything else.

What is starting to lack at Disney IMO is the "wow". Park rides are getting old. Their technology is very old and Disney is loosing their direction with the new rides.

"WOW" can be achieved through amazing effects and technology or through set design and total immersion.

I am into theming and immersion, and I prefer set design rides. I want to believe that I am somewhere else. Horizons set the bar and most anyone who ever saw it misses it. I thought the pre show area of Alien was amazing at setting the mood and feel of the upcoming ride. Unfortunately it was placed in the wrong park and in an area that was almost exclusively for small kids and it scared the bejeebers out of them. Maybe if it had been in the studios where Drew....oh never mind.

I don't want coasters. (6 flags is fine for that.) and movie simulator rides are being overdone ( at both parks).


Maybe new rides are not the answer right now? Oh sure, I think we need to see some new rides now and again, but not what we have been seeing. Right now I would like to see the money spent on updates and upgrades of technology on existing rides. The graveyard ghosts in HM could use some new technology, and Peter Pans flight too, you get the idea.

I have a lot more to say, but it is almost 4 am, my mind is numb and I should have been in bed 5 hrs ago.

One other thing. I go to Disney 4 times more often than I do Universal. But remember, Uni is only a Studio like DSH. So comparing Uni/IOA to all of Disney is like trying to compare Sea World to UNI/IOA.
 
I only read the first three pages, but I hope this thread does not get locked before I can come back tomorrow and explain more...

I agree with you, but I see a different direction for a solution.

I feel that Uni/ IOA definitely has more cutting edge technology and I think they are doing a great job in theming. Seuss landing, Jurassic Park and now WWOHP are perfect examples. They are just more directed at the wild rides that I care for.

I think Walt's idea of a park that the whole family can ride together is a good one and I hope Disney stays on that path. While teens and adventure seekers may go through a period of wanting more amusement style rides, I think overall the family theme park appeals to a wider audience base and is what sets it apart from everything else.

What is starting to lack at Disney IMO is the "wow". Park rides are getting old. Their technology is very old and Disney is loosing their direction with the new rides.

"WOW" can be achieved through amazing effects and technology or through set design and total immersion.

I am into theming and immersion, and I prefer set design rides. I want to believe that I am somewhere else. Horizons set the bar and most anyone who ever saw it misses it. I thought the pre show area of Alien was amazing at setting the mood and feel of the upcoming ride. Unfortunately it was placed in the wrong park and in an area that was almost exclusively for small kids and it scared the bejeebers out of them. Maybe if it had been in the studios where Drew....oh never mind.

I don't want coasters. (6 flags is fine for that.) and movie simulator rides are being overdone ( at both parks).


Maybe new rides are not the answer right now? Oh sure, I think we need to see some new rides now and again, but not what we have been seeing. Right now I would like to see the money spent on updates and upgrades of technology on existing rides. The graveyard ghosts in HM could use some new technology, and Peter Pans flight too, you get the idea.

I have a lot more to say, but it is almost 4 am, my mind is numb and I should have been in bed 5 hrs ago.

One other thing. I go to Disney 4 times more often than I do Universal. But remember, Uni is only a Studio like DSH. So comparing Uni/IOA to all of Disney is like trying to compare Sea World to UNI/IOA.

I agree with you. So many of the existing rides at Disney need updates to bring them up to the times. I don't want to get rid of the classics (Jungle Cruise, Peter Pan, Snow White, etc.), but I'd like these rides to be brought up to today's technology. I think Walt would have wanted this to. After all, he was at the forefront of technical advancements and was always looking towards the future. It only makes sense that had he still been alive, he would still be going by this methodology today. In addition to this, I'd like to see updates to the shows/3D movies, expansions to WS and (almost) total re do to Future World, of etc, have more attractions being created on a yearly basis, and more guest experiences with some of the new characters. The potential is endless, and while these updates will cost a huge amount of $, I really do believe the return on investment will be worth it. We used to vacation at Disney every year. That isn't the case anymore. Why? Because my husband and I like to see and do new things. If Disney was continuously updating the parks, this would compete for the other vacations we've been taking in the last few years. As it currently stands, our main motivation for the trip we plan on taking this year is to go to Universal/Harry Potter. Disney will always be there in my heart, and of course we'll spend half our time there, but had HP not came out, we'd be waiting a few more years for a visit.
 
Totally agree on Stitch. The Extra-Terrorestrial Alien Encounter was scary. Stitch is boring and based on a really bad movie and a totally unlikable character in that bad movie. When Disney went on a Stitch craze a couple years back, it seemed he was everywhere on every piece of merchandise, even mixed in with the classic characters like Mickey, Minnie, etc. I think that was when the Pooh characters were sidelined due to a lawsuit, but that seems to have passed now, thank Heaven!


I agree that the Stitch attraction is awful, but not that it was based on a "really bad movie." In fact, Stitch is extremely lovable to our family. This attraction was one example that proves the point of some posters on here. They could have done so much better with a character that many kids LOVE. Disney totally wasted their money on this attraction instead of putting a little more into it and making it cool. I agree with the posters that say there's been a lot of this lately (other than TSM).
 
Well, at the risk of being a straw that breaks the thread, my 2 cents...

1. US and IOA fans need to stop being so tetchy over HP land. Yes attraction numbers will fall, but no one is suggesting it will be deserted. Yes it is important, no it is not the be all and end all of all things.

2. Anyone who spends less than half a day at DHS plainly has never explored it to its fullest. It takes more than half a day to see the shows, and I'm sorry, but even though they may be similar or the same to the last time you went, you should still watch them. You watch movies more than once right?
You have payed a lot more to get into DHS than buy a DVD again ;)


3. Considering the size of the parks then I would say it will take decades for US to approach Disney in terms of development. Sure, they might have more new things, but they have I would say 20% of all entertainment in florida (Sea World having 20% in my view and disney having 60%). Universal might be winning in terms of progression now, but in the future they might not.


Think back to the 90's. When I went in 98 they an appaling ride there. Men in black. Took up a lot of space, was pretty shabby. Queues never exceeded 20 mins as far as I can recall, and that was in August, and when the economy was still strong too. US will need to work hard to keep up their lead in progression, and I dont think they will. They will walk away, dust off their hands and watch as the money comes in from HP land. Their next big investment is a long time coming, I reckon.

EDIT: In fact, is that still there??? if it is, then I think they should have redone that a long time ago.

Also, you have got to remember that even US themselves dont expect to outdo disney, or put them in the shade. The last thing that universal would want is disney stagnating.


They get a LOT of their trade off people piggybacking a visit to US/IOA when going to Disney. If disney numbers fell, they would lose a significant chunk of their attendees in the childrens age range.
1. I think that some Universal fans are reacting more to the comments that Universal is dirty or that their TM's are nasty or that there is no theming or that the parks only have thrill rides or.... Well you get the idea. ;) The addition of WWOHP is very exciting to me but then I get excited if one of the resorts opens a new counter service place. :hippie:

2. I think that DHS takes more than half a day too...the first 10 times you tour. Frankly, a lot of what's there has become a bit stale.

3. I HOPE that Universal doesn't win in the future. I hope that all of the parks keep building and evolving. Universal has been adding new major things as they go (Mummy's Revenge :lovestruc , The Simpsons, Shrek, RRR and so on) and Disney will hopefully do the same.

Men In Black is still there and very popular. If you recall, it's like Buzz Lightyear but amped up. I haven't noticed it being shabby so I guess that they've spruced it up. People like it so it's not going anywhere. (I hope.)

So sorry, you don't get to kill the thread. Maybe I do? :)
 
I only read the first three pages, but I hope this thread does not get locked before I can come back tomorrow and explain more...

I agree with you, but I see a different direction for a solution.

I feel that Uni/ IOA definitely has more cutting edge technology and I think they are doing a great job in theming. Seuss landing, Jurassic Park and now WWOHP are perfect examples. They are just more directed at the wild rides that I care for.

I think Walt's idea of a park that the whole family can ride together is a good one and I hope Disney stays on that path. While teens and adventure seekers may go through a period of wanting more amusement style rides, I think overall the family theme park appeals to a wider audience base and is what sets it apart from everything else.

What is starting to lack at Disney IMO is the "wow". Park rides are getting old. Their technology is very old and Disney is loosing their direction with the new rides.

"WOW" can be achieved through amazing effects and technology or through set design and total immersion.

I am into theming and immersion, and I prefer set design rides. I want to believe that I am somewhere else. Horizons set the bar and most anyone who ever saw it misses it. I thought the pre show area of Alien was amazing at setting the mood and feel of the upcoming ride. Unfortunately it was placed in the wrong park and in an area that was almost exclusively for small kids and it scared the bejeebers out of them. Maybe if it had been in the studios where Drew....oh never mind.

I don't want coasters. (6 flags is fine for that.) and movie simulator rides are being overdone ( at both parks).


Maybe new rides are not the answer right now? Oh sure, I think we need to see some new rides now and again, but not what we have been seeing. Right now I would like to see the money spent on updates and upgrades of technology on existing rides. The graveyard ghosts in HM could use some new technology, and Peter Pans flight too, you get the idea.

I have a lot more to say, but it is almost 4 am, my mind is numb and I should have been in bed 5 hrs ago.

One other thing. I go to Disney 4 times more often than I do Universal. But remember, Uni is only a Studio like DSH. So comparing Uni/IOA to all of Disney is like trying to compare Sea World to UNI/IOA.
I'm an adventure seeker? Cool. :)

I agree with many of your comments. Both resorts have their place and I guess that's the point. You could look at WDW as a family destination with a bit of thrill thrown in and Universal as a thrill destination with a bit of family thrown in. I have a teen and I'm a mild thrill seeker so Universal is perfect for us. WDW is fun too of course but in a more nostalgic way.

I can also see that Universal could be comparable to DSH as far as scope goes even if I think that Universal has a lot more to offer. I think that IOA should be treated as distinct though and is comparable to... :confused: I really don't think that any of the WDW parks are like it.
 
1. I think that some Universal fans are reacting more to the comments that Universal is dirty or that their TM's are nasty or that there is no theming or that the parks only have thrill rides or.... Well you get the idea.

Exactly. I don't get the hate for Universal. A person can love Disney without having to hate Universal.

I love them both. I just hate seeing a lot of negative things said about Universal that are totally untrue. Do they have their faults? I'm sure they do. Do they have some TM's that are less than perfect. Yes, they do. So does Disney. Universal and Disney are both great places to visit with terrific things for all types of people. I hope they both stay around for a very long time!
 
Not even close! We took my then 4 year old daughter to Universal and to Mk in 2007. She liked Mk and loved the universal parks! We spent 2 days at IOA and 2 days at Universal. The water play areas in Universal, Barney's Show, Shrek and Jimmy Neutron and ET were huge hits for her. At IOA, she loved the Seussland of course! She also loved the water rides and Popeye's boat. To us, Universal was easier to navigate and very child friendly. We adults tried some of the "thrill" rides and loved them. Oh, and the shops and theming are amazing. The only Disney park that I like more for theming is Epcot.

Like I stated earlier.. is it a crime to just say Disney and Universal are both a heck of a good time?? I rest my case..
 
Well, at the risk of being a straw that breaks the thread, my 2 cents...

1. US and IOA fans need to stop being so tetchy over HP land. Yes attraction numbers will fall, but no one is suggesting it will be deserted. Yes it is important, no it is not the be all and end all of all things.

Those you call "US and IOA fans" infact are also Disney fans, why would we be on this board otherwise. Nobody sais WWOHP is the best thing ever and it is natural for attendance numbers to go down to normal for any attraction. But Disney is not the only good park and some people should open their eyes and uncover their ears to see that some park may have success as well.
2. Anyone who spends less than half a day at DHS plainly has never explored it to its fullest. It takes more than half a day to see the shows, and I'm sorry, but even though they may be similar or the same to the last time you went, you should still watch them. You watch movies more than once right?
You have payed a lot more to get into DHS than buy a DVD again ;)


3. Considering the size of the parks then I would say it will take decades for US to approach Disney in terms of development. Sure, they might have more new things, but they have I would say 20% of all entertainment in florida (Sea World having 20% in my view and disney having 60%). Universal might be winning in terms of progression now, but in the future they might not.

They may or may not, we do not know. In decades even Disney may fall apart, who knows, why not to enjoy present instead of checking crystal ball.

Think back to the 90's. When I went in 98 they an appaling ride there. Men in black. Took up a lot of space, was pretty shabby. Queues never exceeded 20 mins as far as I can recall, and that was in August, and when the economy was still strong too. US will need to work hard to keep up their lead in progression, and I dont think they will. They will walk away, dust off their hands and watch as the money comes in from HP land. Their next big investment is a long time coming, I reckon.

I was there at 2003 or 2004, do not remember, in August as well. MIB had 2.5 hours line with DJ and ball games to keep people patient. FP were still there and were sold out by afternoon. We had only 1 day there and we standed and waited. Ride was a blast and the building, a copy of MIB HQ was trully amazing. Terminator had a huge line as well but we asked TM if we can get earlier then our FP because of our bus and they let us. Show cannot possibly be compared with any other show at US or Disney, that good. I do not know present attendance but back then it was pretty high. Why such negativity about their profit with HP. They invested a lot of money and stores is a natural source of money flow, where do you think money go when we buy 10th pair of ears at Disney.

EDIT: In fact, is that still there??? if it is, then I think they should have redone that a long time ago.

Also, you have got to remember that even US themselves dont expect to outdo disney, or put them in the shade. The last thing that universal would want is disney stagnating.


They get a LOT of their trade off people piggybacking a visit to US/IOA when going to Disney. If disney numbers fell, they would lose a significant chunk of their attendees in the childrens age range.
Absolutely, Universal is not a full vacation destination, just like DL it is good for 2-3 days top. To be a full time vacation they need 2 more parks but I do not think they even want it as they will have to build more hotels, deal with transportation system and pretty much face same problems Disney does. For their size they have more then enough profit. They not a competition to Disney for long vacations, only for locals with AP who is looking for a day of fun rides and do not want to hop Disney parks for headliners, Universal is more compact and therefore one can get more for a day trip.
If I were local, I would hold AP for both Disney and US, visiting mostly Epcot, US and MK with a short stop at IOA for WWOHP. Too bad I am not local.

:)
 
I feel that Uni/ IOA definitely has more cutting edge technology and I think they are doing a great job in theming. Seuss landing, Jurassic Park and now WWOHP are perfect examples. They are just more directed at the wild rides that I care for.

What is starting to lack at Disney IMO is the "wow". Park rides are getting old. Their technology is very old and Disney is loosing their direction with the new rides.
"WOW" can be achieved through amazing effects and technology or through set design and total immersion.

I am into theming and immersion, and I prefer set design rides. I want to believe that I am somewhere else. Horizons set the bar and most anyone who ever saw it misses it. I thought the pre show area of Alien was amazing at setting the mood and feel of the upcoming ride. Unfortunately it was placed in the wrong park and in an area that was almost exclusively for small kids and it scared the bejeebers out of them. Maybe if it had been in the studios where Drew....oh never mind.

I don't want coasters. (6 flags is fine for that.) and movie simulator rides are being overdone ( at both parks).


Maybe new rides are not the answer right now? Oh sure, I think we need to see some new rides now and again, but not what we have been seeing. Right now I would like to see the money spent on updates and upgrades of technology on existing rides. The graveyard ghosts in HM could use some new technology, and Peter Pans flight too, you get the idea.

One other thing. I go to Disney 4 times more often than I do Universal. But remember, Uni is only a Studio like DSH. So comparing Uni/IOA to all of Disney is like trying to compare Sea World to UNI/IOA.


I rarely compare Universal to Disneyworld. IMO they are two different animals. I will go to HP land and WDW. That being said, I'm a disney loyalist who has seen a slide in the world over the last few years, period. In all areas I'm totally sadden by the restaurants (you all know how I feel about the quality issues there) and what I preceive is just a general lack of imagination.

Even the gift shops show a lack of imagination. every gift shop sells the same exact stuff over and over. (Come on Disney, you have a gazillion villians why is it we only see nightmare at Xmas junk. don't even get me started on Hannah Montana. :scared1:)

Sorry, I agree with alot of other posters DHS could be so much more. Almost every thing there needs an update, from Indiana Jones to star tours to muppets. It's OLD. Don't even get me started on the "Great movie ride". The animatronics technology is ridiculous and for Godsake, Please, please some one get a new Judy Garland. The park is supposed to be a homage to the movie industry. Get with it, the movies industry has had some amazing technological advances.

I love Animal Kingdom but I swear the Yeti has been broken more time than it's been fixed. why?
 
The Mummy isn't just a coaster. Actually that's just one small element of the attraction.

As for simulators, those didn't start at Disney either nor did the Sum of All Thrills technology. I prefer to think of it as the themeparks taking existing technology and using it in creative ways. :)

It's funny, because Disney specifically put The Sum of All Thrills in because UO was already using those arms for Forbidden Journey, so no, UO was definitely not following in Disney's footsteps on that one. It just so happens that it's much easier and waaaaaay cheaper to set a stationary arm in an existing building than to build a 20-acre all new section of the park.

As always, Disney fans feel more insecure about Universal than Disney does. Universal does what they do very well and they fill a very nice void that Disney leaves. There is no reason not to like them both, and Universal is better than Disney at some things, Disney is better at others.

However, I think the OPs point is well made - Disney is definitely falling behind the curve, and with the same company now owning Seaworld, Bush Gardens, Legoland and 50% of UO, they need to stop letting the bean counters convince them that adding a new restaurant and a few princess meet-n-greets is the way to keep guests interested.

People on these typs of boards tend to get the impression that most people that go to Disney feel the same way they do, but that's not the case. We are a highly self-selected group of people, and while Disney's lack of committment to improving guest experience isn't as likely to convince us to make fewer trips, it certainly does to others. I can't count the number of people I know that have been to Disney in the past few years that won't go back until there is something new. Not because they didn't enjoy themselves - they did. They just would rather spend their vacation money going other places and experiencing new things, and until Disney adds something significant they have the whole "been there, done that" attitude.

Disney's attendance hasn't dropped significantly because of all the specials they have been running, so people are getting more bang for their buck. That's not going to last forever, though, and answering UO's addition of WWoHP with a new "Finding Nemo"-type ride and a couple of more places to buy cheap crap and get a pixie to sign your notebook isn't going to cut it.

They may benefit in the short term from WWoHP because, contrary to what some people believe, UO is bringing in people that otherwise would not be traveling to Orlando and aren't really into theme parks, but since they are already there they will visit Disney for a day or so. Of course, Disney is also losing visitors that are shortening their vacation at Disney to add a day or two at UO.

At any rate, competition is a good thing and we all benefit from it. Disney would not even be considering this Fantasyland expansion if not for reacting to UO.
 
I don't understand why they don't do more with the Pixar division. The movies are top notch and have stood the test of time. In fact, those are the only really quality movies that are coming out of Disney at the moment. A Monsters Inc. ride would be great.
The new real estate vacation home lots they are selling for 1.5-8 million. Those are just ludicrous! Scrap that and maybe do another moderate resort.

I have said before that I would like to see WDW stay more family oriented in its rides, I cannot do the majority, if not all of the ones at Universal. I like being able to go to WDW and do most of the rides. At least I don't get bored for the amount of money I am spending!

Just my $.02...

Case in point, Disney has had preliminary plans to do a Monster's Inc.-themed coaster (think of the doors in the movie and how they ran on the tracks) for years, but it's never been green-lighted due to $$.
 
. Not because they didn't enjoy themselves - they did. They just would rather spend their vacation money going other places and experiencing new things, and until Disney adds something significant they have the whole "been there, done that" attitude.

Disney's attendance hasn't dropped significantly because of all the specials they have been running, so people are getting more bang for their buck. That's not going to last forever, though, and answering UO's addition of WWoHP with a new "Finding Nemo"-type ride and a couple of more places to buy cheap crap and get a pixie to sign your notebook isn't going to cut it.

At any rate, competition is a good thing and we all benefit from it. Disney would not even be considering this Fantasyland expansion if not for reacting to UO.

That's a concern to me. I'm a rarity in my circle. I'm a disney nut who loves to go often. most of my friends are not and in a bad economy none of them are considering going back with so many vacation alternatives.

I always ask people who are not fanatically like me.;) would they go without the discounts or the free dining and most say no. IMO that's very telling.
 
Let me start my post here by saying that I LOVE Disney. I always have and I always will. Whether they continue to compel me to want to spend my money on their property is explored a bit further in my post – but make no mistake about my deep love and affection for Disney.

I think the lack of unique development is a result of 2 contributing factors. Firstly – that the guys in charge of the parks and resorts are suits. They don’t care about the people in the parks. They truly see theme park goers as peons, and they try to run the parks and resorts from their spreadsheets. And if you want some proof – just take a look at the marketing campaign. Are Disneyland and Walt Disney World REALLY that homogenous that you can create a twofer marketing campaign by branding things as “Disney Parks”? I don’t believe they are. That decision was made ENTIRELY from a spreadsheet when someone made a discovery that for the same price as ONE marketing campaign, they could pitch both the east coast and west coast destinations.

The other contributing factor is that the parks and resorts division has become the cash cow for other failed business investments. (Go.com, The Family Channel, ESPN….) They’re forced to increase profit margins by giving less and charging more to cover losses in other divisions so that their shareholders can make a profit.

If you want to read more about this stuff – take a look at DisneyWar by James Stewart. FASCINATING read. He had unparalleled access to the upper management of Disney during the years when Roy Disney waged war against Eisner through the SaveDisney.com campaign.



I’ve stayed at value and moderate resorts. And I LOVE them.

But at the same time, I HATE them. When the Polynesian and Contemporary were first built, they by no means were cheap. But they weren’t that much more than off-property resorts. The price was FAIR. You were paying for a nice resort experience, a good room, AND the location. Then they built the Caribbean Beach Resort. And the rates that were being charged for the Polynesian, became the Caribbean Beach Resort rates. And the Polynesian and Contemporary became even more expensive. Then they built the value resorts. And moderate prices were now VALUE prices and both Caribbean Beach and the Polynesian (and by extension, other deluxe hotels) rates were jacked up again. For the same price as a Garden View room at the Grand Floridian – that’s a BASIC room with a less-than-spectacular view – you can get a luxury sweet with unlimited access to a BMW at an off-property hotel. I researched that a while ago – so I don’t remember which one.

No matter what – the Disney resorts are simply over-priced. I really wish they would make life easier on EVERYONE and lower the dang rates! The whole idea of charging obscene amounts of money and then offering a “great deal” (Monster PIN code, anyone? 40% off) to fill the rooms just REEKS of tactics used by slimy used car salesmen. (As a side note – used car salesmen need not be offended! Every profession has its share of bad apples – and I am using ONLY the bad apples as an example here. I am NOT talking about all used car salesmen!)

In any event, I hate those PIN codes with a passion. And not because I begrudge anybody a discount. What I hate is the very idea that a select few, chosen at what seems to be completely random, get a bargain while others get nothing. Make the offer to EVERYONE or don’t make it at all. Or, as I said, better yet – lower your rack rates to a REASONABLE price!!!!!



Well said! I’m just afraid that the Disney my daughter is getting to know is a pale comparison of what Disney used to be.



Walt actually had plans to build a ski lodge in Colorado. That’s where the Country Bear Jamboree came from. It was originally designed as an attraction for the Lodge that was never built.

I don’t have a problem with Disney building resorts away from the theme parks. It does allow them to offer something to people who don’t care about a theme park. Not to mention – there are TONS of Disney fans with family members who would sell portions of their anatomy to visit a non-theme park location. My wife wants to go to Hawaii and I do too. And I can say with almost absolute certainty, that we’ll probably end up at Aulani.



I rented DVC points at one point and the gentleman I rented from had to waitlist my request because his home resort was sold out. This was back in 2007. Things may have changed since then – but I think if they’re building, Disney is finding a profit it.





Frankly, I think that the Three Caballeros fit into the Mexican Pavilion about as well as the three cows from Home on the Range would fit onto Big Thunder Mountain. Sure – you could find a reason to tie them in – but neither of these attractions were built as a showcase for animated characters.

For what it’s worth – I don’t think the Magic Carpets fit into Adventureland. It started out as a faithful, yet sanitized version of the jungles in the South Pacific and Southeast Asia. The imagineers worked hard to keep things real and make it seem as though you were there – without the mosquitos and the diseases they brought with them. Then they plopped down the Magic Carpets. Yes – Aladdin loosely ties in there – but only if it were a live action film. It wasn’t a cartoon location. And I don’t find the Mexican pavilion to be a cartoon location either.



AMEN, sister! 

My daughter LOVES Universal. She loved the pool at Portofino Bay. She LOVED Seuss Landing and could have easily spent a day there, just exploring. She LOVED the Curious George playground. And while she couldn’t ride it? She LOVED the whole Simpsons area. She adored looking at all the merchandise and seeing the Kwik-E-Mart. This was all on a trip where she turned 2 while we were traveling. She also LOVED spending time in the Jurassic Park Discovery Center. She met Spiderman – and I SWEAR that, to her, was bigger than eating with the princesses at Disney. She loved it.



I’m not getting upset – but I visit Universal as often as I visit Disney and I have NEVER, EVER seen what you’re describing. I’ve had a lot of interaction with Universal team members and have found them to be extremely polite, helpful and friendly. In fact – one trip, we were spending the day at Universal while staying at the Polynesian. My wife and I both had bug bites all over us. From Universal we called housekeeping and asked that the sheets be changed. Housekeeping actually gave us attitude about it! They insisted their properties didn’t have bugs, and we had left the doors open. We then went to activate our Universal annual passes and the Guest Services Team Member was WONDERFUL. It was a stark contrast to what I had just experienced on the phone with Disney. And I won’t even get into the difference in the staff at the Universal resorts as opposed to Disney resorts. Universal blows Disney AWAY. Or actually, I should say, Loews blows Disney AWAY.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but in all the times I’ve visited Universal, I have yet to see the horror at the Universal parks that is described on the Disney Theme Parks board.



I see this kind of remark all the time and I truly don’t understand it. I’ve visited Six Flags. Their game is pure, bare-bones, thrill. That’s NOT what Universal is about. Just heading into the Studios – it’s gone now – but on Twister, you NEVER moved. You watched a show. On Shrek, you’re in a seat that shakes – but it never actually moves. It’s still bolted to the same spot on the floor. The Mummy is absolutely a coaster. As is Rip, Ride Rockit. A Day in the Park with Barney, E.T., Animal Actors on Location, Fievel’s Playground, Woody Woodpecker’s Coaster, Curious George – ALL appropriate for little ones. Disaster is a slow moving train that shakes from an earthquake. This is NO different than catastrophe canyon. Jaws is a slow moving boat ride. Yes, there’s a shark – but I certainly wouldn’t call this a thrill. I would say it’s about on par with Dinosaur. The Simpsons is a simulator. No different than Star Tours. Then there’s Men in Black. It’s a slow moving vehicle that sometimes spins. Out of fifteen rides – only TWO provide actual “thrill” in terms of roller coaster. And this is only the rides! I threw in a few shows – but there’s a bunch more. I could go through the Islands of Adventure – but to say that Universal is on par with Six Flags is terms of providing visceral thrill ONLY is just baseless. When comparing Universal Studios against Hollywood Studios? I think that Universal Studios comes out on top in EVERY aspect. It has rides that are just as good, and in some cases better than what’s provided at Hollywood Studios – and as a movie park, I think it blows Hollywood Studios out of the water.

And again I say – I love Disney. I also love Universal. But I truly think that you don’t have to like one at the expense of the other. And if you really think that Universal and Disney aren’t in competition – think again. They are. And that’s a GOOD thing for the consumer. It keeps both companies on their toes.

Bingo.
 
Is that a personal attack, are you calling me delusional? :sad2::sad2::sad2:
Have you even been to Universal or it is lame because it is Universal? I do not compare WWOHP to EE or Soarin but to MK expansion. I bet if Disney was doing Harry Potter, everyone would be excited but since it is Universal, well, enough said. Why people cannot enjoy both worlds, is it so necessary to pick sides. Childish.

Psst - all this poster does is put down Uni at every opportunity. Go see the one post she's made in the Uni section since WWoHP opened and that will tell you everything.
 
Not even close! We took my then 4 year old daughter to Universal and to Mk in 2007. She liked Mk and loved the universal parks! We spent 2 days at IOA and 2 days at Universal. The water play areas in Universal, Barney's Show, Shrek and Jimmy Neutron and ET were huge hits for her. At IOA, she loved the Seussland of course! She also loved the water rides and Popeye's boat. To us, Universal was easier to navigate and very child friendly. We adults tried some of the "thrill" rides and loved them. Oh, and the shops and theming are amazing. The only Disney park that I like more for theming is Epcot.

My 9 year old girl and 4 year old son much prefer UO to Disney.
 
That's a concern to me. I'm a rarity in my circle. I'm a disney nut who loves to go often. most of my friends are not and in a bad economy none of them are considering going back with so many vacation alternatives.

I always ask people who are not fanatically like me.;) would they go without the discounts or the free dining and most say no. IMO that's very telling.

Yep, I think it's definitely something to be concerned about.
 
Yep, I think it's definitely something to be concerned about.


I do too. Everyone knows that when you start to offer sales you decrease the value of the merchandise/service being offered. People are expecting discounts now. I certainly would not go if one was not being offered. Why pay full value if they are going to offer a discount down the road? Or the possibility of a discount? I will just wait until the discount comes out!
 
Isn't that really all Harry Potter World is? A new restaurant, some wizard and wand-seller meet-n-greets, one new attraction and two refurbs? ;)

:earsboy:

Not even that, actually. The restaurant is a refurb, too. So Disney is adding two *new* restaurants to MK, one TS (Be Our Guest) and one CS (Gaston's). And man, am I excited about a new TS in that park; it has needed one for a while!

IMO, HP may have more initial drawing power because of the series' popularity, but the FL expansion is actually including more to see. One ride is getting a simple refurb (Barnstormer), one is being refurbed AND expanded AND having a whole new queue concept introduced (Dumbo), one whole new ride is being built, two whole new restaurants are being built, and a we're getting a bunch of more deeply interactive meet-and-greets with the princesses ala Ollivander's.

And honestly, I'm as excited to see the Beast's library as I am to see Hogwarts...*total book nerd here*...
 
I have posted several times here and I am wondering how many of us true disney world lovers think instead of building houses for the megarich,disney should focus on refurbs and new attractions.One other thing I think that is overlooked is the fact that while the past ten years have been stagnant for disney attraction wise,prices haven't been,they steadily increase. We are paying alot more for basically the same stuff. I know we too have reduced our trips to the world,which saddens me.I used to be like a little kid and couldn't wait to go back and see what they had done.I hope they improve and kudos to universal for keeping the attractions coming!
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top