DonMacGregor
Sub Leader
- Joined
- May 13, 2021
I get that you're 100% in on the POS being the only thing that matters, but courts don't operate in vacuums and case law develops new precedent every day. Since this is the first time this has happened, a court will need to hear arguments from both sides and I'm simply saying that "I never expected to be able to use the resort after 2042, and I entered a contract with the understanding that my use and enjoyment will end in 2042, but now that someone else can enjoy it longer, I want to too" argument may not make the cut under tort law.The injury would come in to play in 2042 when owners who didn't pay for an extension can't use their points at a resort that has not yet expired per the POS document. But, as you said, we see it differently and in 2042, we will know what DVD decides to do and what any original owners decide to do.
We shall see.