This is why I still think one of the options DVC/Disney could implement is restricting access to the Volcano pool to the Poly2 guests. Will they do that? Probably not, but it is an option. Like you said in your comment, Disney can (and has!) change things up at any time which impacts the feel of a resort.
Your point about the reasoning why Disney won't do this (Poly2 will be part of Poly, so the guests of Poly2 will have access to all the Polynesian amenities) is a very good one. I think that is a very valid point based on how things have been due up until this point...as in, Disney has never restricted anything at a resort to any subset of guests at that resort. If you believe in the principle "The best predictor of future actions is past actions", then it is HIGHLY unlikely Disney would restrict that Volcano pool so the Poly2 guests can't use it.
But that doesn't mean Disney can't restrict the Volcano pool. I am assuming Disney evaluated the benefits and potential consequences of opening the Poly2 addition. During that process of due diligence, I am assuming Disney had several discussions with the GM of the Polynesian to see how this would affect the resort. What if the GM expressed how much this would negatively impact an already stressed Volcano pool? Then Disney thinks "one solution is to make Poly2 a separate association and then build a really nice pool at Poly2 and the guests of Poly2 can only use that pool, which would keep the Poly2 addition from adding to the already crowded situation at Volcano pool".
Again, I am not saying this will happen but I think saying that it is impossible for Disney to do this is not accurate. They have shown they are willing to change the rules.
Of course, Disney (not DVD or DVC) can restrict who uses the pool. It is part of their hotel. That is true.
They can give the Poly tower guests access and limit PVB to just the quiet pool.
They could decide to limit the Volcano pool to only those staying on cash and leave DVC out completely.
But I thought we were discussing whether it could happen via the decision on whether it is a new or the same DVC condo association.
You don’t need a different association to limit pool access. You don’t need the same association to grant access. The association designation has nothing to do with it.
It is the terms of the POS which gives DVC owners the rights..or lack there of..to amenities at a resort and has nothing to do with how the condo association is created.
Do you really think Disney would agree to limiting cash guests who are paying them to stay at one of their hotel locations who choose the tower villas from using any of the 3 pools at that location?
No they would not and because Disney, not DVD, controls the operations and the amenities of their own hotels…we pay them our share for the use of the facilities,,.it’s their decision on how things roll out.
Why do you think those staying at BCV after the closure but before BC opened didn’t have the use of SAB? Because the DVC condo association there had no say or right to tell Disney they needed to open it as it’s part of their hotel.
As I said, this tower, regardless of what types of rooms it has changes then number of guests at the Poly and that will have a great impact on pool use. which is why they are building a 3rd pool.
So, my point regarding the pool access being based on the association is accurate
Now, they could change their minds and decide to not advertise this as part of Poly. If they do that, then those guests would be limited from using Poly pools because its no longer part of that resort.
So, that option is something that they could decide to do.