I teach computer science at a reputable* university; I typically teach senior-level electives. My students are talented, engaged, and highly motivated. We work very hard to write clear, direct project specifications. We have refined those specifications over years to clarify anything that might have been unclear in earlier versions.
Even among this group it is common to miss some important instruction or another. Given that experience, I just can't get worked up over the idea that most people do not know about the nooks and crannies that super-users might use to get one or two extra low-wait rides on a theme park attraction. It's not realistic to expect that anyone who doesn't treat this as a somewhat-obsessive hobby will do that. And for most people, it's fine. They get to experience some attractions with low wait, and they have good days.
There's a broader question here, which is some combination of FOMO and what I think of as a zero-sum fallacy. Many of us have some idea that of Some Guest gets extra G+ rides, that means other Guests have less fun. That's only true if I equate how much fun I have with how many highly-popular attractions I experience, or think that if I don't get to experience the Shiny New Attraction my visit to the park is pointless.
I've had many days where I just followed my nose, did things that had little or no wait, saw a bunch of shows, and enjoyed the atmosphere of the parks. Those days are fantastic.
-------------------
*: Opinions of The Ohio State University alumni notwithstanding.