Sounds lovely. Where do we get the funds?
Actually from the time this started, they have done that. People could get unemployment if they were off work due to Covid 19.
It’s not always a financial incentive. People with very light symptoms like “a cough” work because they want to have a job not just get paid for that day. I work on days that some of you are saying people should take off because that is how my job gets done, it has nothing to do with my paycheck. I wouldn’t work with fever or a hacking cough. But more allergies type, yes I probably would.
There is no need to worry about board rules. Cares Act covers unemployment benefits for those who test positive, are quarantined due to exposure, or live with someone who tests positives or is quarantined due to exposure.
I have found no accommodation for unemployment coverage once an individual receives a negative Covid-19 diagnosis. However, an employer, healthcare provider or public official can determine an individual is at risk for exposure. That individual may be eligible for UC based on federal, state and/or local guidelines through the Cares Act. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act also provides coverage for many private and public employees as a temporary expansion for FMLA coverage including up to 80 hours paid leave.But not people who stay home because they have symptoms but test negative. Which is a problem, when we're talking about wanting people who have any of the dozen or so possible symptoms of the virus to stay home until they can be tested.
I’m wondering about this myself. And did the second hairdresser get it from the first? How so, if they were wearing their masks?
I have horrible allergies. This time of year I'm constantly coughing and sneezing. Should I stay home every day? I'd be homeless in short order.
Yes, I can generally tell the difference too. But people around me can't. I'd hate to be vilified for daring to work when I'm not contagious at all.
So you are the only client this person has? And you are not working outside the home atm?Because we didn’t feel there was a need to! We were not in close contact with anyone else and we both agreed it was unecesary. Neither of us are obese , elderly , or have any other health problems so our risk are very low.
I find myself liking a lot of your posts today. Not stalking you, I promise!You do realize that the whole point of masks is not to protect the wearer, but to prevent the spread of the virus, right? It’s for the greater good.
I am sure I am not and no I don’t work.Maybe the people are smarter where you live but here at any given moment Id say at least a quarter of the mask wearing population are wearing masks incorrectly, either on their chins (worst) or below their noses (bad). I'd also wonder about the bathroom. Assuming the masks were worn correctly in public, who is to say they arent taking off the mask for a break in the bathroom. With poor ventilation that could easily be a transmission point.
Those of you that this describes realize you could be asymptomatic and have allergies, correct? I mention this because on average larger droplets are expelled further when coughing and sneezing than with regular talking and breathing. So you could be infecting people with COVID due to your allergy symptoms. Obviously we are at a point where people arent going to stay home any longer. That is why it is important to not place yourself in indoor situations where you are lingering without purpose, maintaining an at least 6 ft barrier between yourself and other people and wearing a face covering if possible. I'm not even trying to say stay home anymore. But at least we can take precautions, right?
I have bad seasonal allergies and mild year round allergies so I get the inconvenience factor. But unless Ive had a recent negative test I dont think its worth possibly infecting others unnecessarily and will take the precautions that I can to protect others.
Anyone that is coughing or sneezing unprotected is spewing more whatever into their immediate environment. I will admit to being someone who tries to ID who just coughed and to move away from that person. Even if the cough isnt due to COVID the person could be spreading COVID with the cough.
So you are the only client this person has? And you are not working outside the home atm?
Then I have to say that I am sorry but she put you at risk.I am sure I am not and no I don’t work.
While I don't disagree with your larger point I think this above statement kinda showcases things. A test administered does not protect against future infections. This is why some of the people are being tested every day or nearly every day.But unless Ive had a recent negative test I dont think its worth possibly infecting others unnecessarily and will take the precautions that I can to protect others.
As of Friday, one exposed person who underwent screening tested positive for the virus.So has anyone tested positive from the hairdressers? If the first hairdresser worked for 9 days, that’s enough time for people to start showing symptoms.
While I don't disagree with your larger point I think this above statement kinda showcases things. A test administered does not protect against future infections. This is why some of the people are being tested every day or nearly every day.
No worriesI realize a test is just accurate for a specific point in time (or maybe not even but weve got to start somewhere). By recent I meant within the last day or two, depending on how long it took to get results. I realize even then isnt foolproof unless it is a rapid test. I should have defined recent though because while I meant a day or two, some people could easily take that to mean a week or even more. "Recent" is a very imprecise term.
Ok great. And since I would literally be staying home every day if I missed work every time I had a cough or the sniffles, who's going to pay my rent or bills? I get what you're saying and it's a nice idea, but it's not realistic for most people.
As of Friday, one exposed person who underwent screening tested positive for the virus.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/missouri-hair-salon-exposed-140-230420383.html
I am at risk every time I leave the house. I still choose to go out .Then I have to say that I am sorry but she put you at risk.
You are at risk every time you are in a car but you still put on a seat belt.I am at risk every time I leave the house. I still choose to go out .
I would say the person isn't ignoring measures they are actively choosing a different choice; they are aware that such efforts are out there in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of spread should one of more of them have the virus.You are at risk every time you are in a car but you still put on a seat belt.
You are at risk every time you cross a street but you still look both ways.
etc
Just because a risk exists doesn't mean you should ignore measures that mitigate the severity of the risk.
As of Friday, one exposed person who underwent screening tested positive for the virus.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/missouri-hair-salon-exposed-140-230420383.html
A mask is not 100% effective and nobody said it was. It is effective in preventing some illness, not all. If a mask was not used the infection rate could very well be much higher, as you know.Good to know the mask wasn’t effective. I was really hoping it was.
A mask is not 100% effective and nobody said it was. It is effective in preventing some illness, not all. If a mask was not used the infection rate could very well be much higher, as you know.