Colleen27
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
Trust me, I know. Which is why we have one person full time dedicated to tracking this down. And which is why I am asking for a link so we can examine who is making that claim. I don't think what is reported in the Media is necessarily incorrect or speculation. But given we have only been dealing with covid-19 for just over a year, our understanding is rapidly changing.
Reminds me a bit of what my parents told me about why they started smoking in the 1930's and 40's. Their Doctors recommended it for their health! It wasn't until the 1950's the links to cancer became common knowledge. Good Lord willing, we will all be around 5 or 10 years from now and I suspect we will have a better understanding of covid-19 then that we do now.
I think "incorrect or speculation" is overstating things a bit, but I also think media has incentives to focus on the negative which ends up amplifying a certain set of voices and views despite the fact that there are others who are just as qualified who would present a very different view. For example, the JHU epidemiologist who takes the view that we're nearing herd immunity has an op-ed in a fully paywalled news outlet; the U of MN epidemiologist who colorfully predicted a "category 5 covid hurricane" on the horizon has been on the Sunday morning talk show circuit and is quoted in every publication from the Washington Post to WebMD. That isn't because he's inherently more credible. It is because he's saying something that drives traffic in a much more compelling way. And to ignore the (awful) reality that the shifting business model for news outlets puts traffic as second only to accuracy is to miss a significant part of the picture when it comes to what we hear, how often we hear it, and who we hear it from.