Thank you, everyone, for the info about what was not shown about Paul. Maybe I would've felt differently about him had I seen it, but I sat there and watched Josh say very hateful things to people's faces, so what makes him any better as far as personal attacks against people?
I do get that there is a lot I missed, and while I think that the jury should vote for the best player, as some others pointed out, there is no rule on that's how you have to make your decision -- so, they certainly have the prerogative to make it personal, if they want.
Thank you for mentioning this as it was one of the reasons I didn't like Cody. If he only has partial custody and gets his daughter during the summer, why would he give that up for a game he didn't even know that well, AND more importantly, doesn't even like people?
Got a question for those that watch the live feeds... In past seasons, we always knew who was on slop. There were some years where we actually saw the "have and have-not" competitions. Did they still have those and they just weren't televised? If not, how was it determined who was a have-not? I never heard anyone complain about being a have-not, so it made me wonder if this is even still a thing. I heard references to slop a few times, but it seemed to be such a bigger deal in earlier seasons.