OK then - we've finally got a government out-and-out saying zero cases is the only acceptable goal.
I fear other countries will not be far behind in revealing this absurd end-game and I pray Canada is not one of them.
To make this clear, this is not the Federal government stating that goal, it is the state government. A large part of that motivation is because other states and several neighbouring countries HAVE achieved it, and Victorians will not be welcome into those states and countries until we achieve the same.
You say you wish Godspeed to those people suffering with severe cases, which is fine, but they are just words. I bet if you had a loved one or you yourself suffered at that level, the zero case goal would look more attractive. My reality is my husband will probably die if he catches Covid. I would have liked to have seen better containment early on.
That reminds me of a road safety ad that played on TV here a few years ago. They asked a man what he thought an 'acceptable' road toll would be. He said, 'maybe 70'. They then brought out 70 people: all his friends and family. His answer to an 'acceptable' number immediately changed to zero.
I’m not sure what good a vaccine is really going to do when so many people (half in some places) admit they won’t take it.
As a whole, Australians are extremely good about vaccines. The immunisation coverage rate for children is above 91% in all states and territories and this year around 2/3 of adults said they had either had or were going to have the flu vaccine. I read a survey recently that indicated around 90% of people would be willing to have the vaccine.
Imagine you are someone who does not have a partner, and is used to engaging and does have sex with more than one partner. It's a totally common and normal thing, and now the message is not to do so, or outright preventing that from happening because state or provincial borders are closed too. No wonder people are getting fed up. First we were told 'flatten the curve'. We did. Then the message was that a vaccine would not come in 2020 as we were told, but maybe next year or even some messages saying 2-3 years. Then the goal shifted to 0 cases.
Well I guess you will be pleased to know that there is no definition of an 'intimate partner'. It could be the person you met on Tinder last week. It could change every other night. As long as you are sleeping with them, you are allowed to see them and anybody they live with, with no restrictions in place (except you can't do the walk of shame past curfew).
In fact, they are actually given MORE rights than single people who want to see their best friend or parent; the Premier today announced that you can't be in the house with your bubble buddy's other household members and both of you are required to wear a mask. So my widowed 71 year old aunt has to wear a mask to see her best friend and isn't allowed to see her husband, but my mum's coworker's son's girlfriend can hang out with his entire family (and he with hers) without wearing masks because they sleep together.
Frankly, I think it's ridiculous to be arguing that if you're having sex then you shouldn't have to follow the same restrictions about distancing, masks, etc. as everyone else, just because sleeping with multiple people is 'a totally common and normal thing'; there are so many 'totally common and normal things' that we currently can't do because of health and safety concerns, and frankly I think there are many of them that should take priority over the ability to have casual sex (which I'd have no issue with in normal times).
https://www.9news.com.au/national/c...reg-hunt/e28cb358-b197-4562-9ab8-dea085993508
Interesting that the health minister says people should not be locked
down...
I am also curious why there are so many deaths and who is dying? This seems to suggest elderly in care homes like we have seen elsewhere.
https://www.health.gov.au/news/heal...s-covid-19-current-situation-and-case-numbers
Yes, there were outbreaks in aged care, which have led to a lot of deaths; there have been 683 deaths in Victoria and 537 were from aged care. This has exposed serious issues with the aged care system, particularly with the casual workforce; too many employees were working across multiple facilities and didn't have access to any sort of leave entitlements.